Gender Superiority & Preference
The presidential campaigns have been a hot topic lately and the concept of Gender Superiority has been a hot button issue for a lot of people in the media. The feminists are out in full force. The male supremacy camps are also out pretty heavily. And I’m hearing “traditional leadership roles” pretty much constantly and it translates to “Old White men should be in charge of everything.” I hear it everywhere. “Should a woman be president?” “Aren’t men natural leaders?” and the one that got ALL of this started for me. There was a lot going on in kaya’s blog about it also.
A woman at the market said “No woman is fit to be a leader and no woman ever will be”. The conversation got started because the woman said this in response to a young woman her own age bouncing up happily in her Hillary 08 tee shirt. ” No woman is fit to be a leader and no woman ever will be.” I really couldn’t believe I heard it. And it really just made me step back. She and Hillary-Tee Shirt lady started the back and forth and Collard Green Cooler lady kept on talking about male superiority, the natural roles of women, and how women ruined the world by not accepting that men are just superior to women. I just stood there holding my bunch of collard greens and listening. Master finally came over and got me. For the rest of our grocery trip, I was utterly silenced. When it was all said and done, I felt sick. I came home and talked to Master about that encounter, the things I’ve been reading in blogs and I’ve been trying to sort it all out.? This post is the result of all that thinking.
To be honest, the phrase “All men are superior to women.” sticks in my throat like a pubic hair. Try as I might I just cannot swallow it.? It’s not for the reasons you probably think.? It is probably my deep desire for oneness and tolerance in humanity that keeps me from doing so. In my heart, I feel that as long as we’re making sweeping generalizations we aren’t getting any closer to ridding the world of all the “isms” that plague it. And while I know that it is possibly niave to believe that we will one day be a tolerant society where humanity is free of “isms” I have to hold out hope. Gender superiority that outweighs credit for individual ability is something I just can’t abide it.
I don’t believe that men are superior to women. I don’t believe that women are superior to men. Generalizations and stereotypes live in the gray area between truth and ignorance and should not in my opinion be given weight. Saying “All Men are _______” or”All women are _________” is flawed and presumptuous.
I’m a submissive female and I submit to a Master. I submit to him because I believe that he is individually more suited for leading me than anyone else who has tried to fill that role in my life. Men have tried. Women have tried. They were all found lacking not because of the gender they were but because of the people were. I am sure there are women in the world who could lead me. That said, it is my preference to be led by a male because I have adjusted my way of being to having primarily heterosexual leanings. It is my preference, to be led by a man and I can make that choice while leaving the potential for successful leaders in either gender intact.
Society and cultural moires assign leadership qualities to men and subservient ones to women, but if we look at individual examples with honesty and integrity, the sweeping generalizations no longer hold water. The word “All”, whether written or implied falls away. “No woman is fit to lead” is an becomes arguable and ignorant statement where as “I prefer the leadership of men while still finding that some women can lead and have done so with great success.” shows preference without belittlement. I can’t say that all men make better leaders. In my own life, I know that not to be true. I’ve seen some piss poor excuses for leadership, both male and female. I’ve seen women make better decisions countless times. I’ve seen men who are weak, men who are incapable of decision making, men who cower in the face of danger almost as often as I’ve seen men step up to the plate and take up leadership positions the way that our cultural and social definitions tell them they should. That said, I have seen women display leadership qualities that go against the role society defines for them just as often! Knowing that, and having experienced it, I could really never honestly say that all men are better leaders just because their men or vice versa.
So that’s why I have to ask myself: If a person sees and experiences situations that prove wrong their own “laws of superiority”, why would they choose to persist in that line of thinking? After admitting that women have made very good leaders, often times better than men, the “Men are always superior leaders.” line of thinking should rationally and reasonably fall apart. Why keep holding on to it after it has been disproved? Why keep insisting that there is a such thing as male (or female) superiority across the board when it’s obvious that just like generalizations and stereotypes, it’s a fundamentally flawed concept?
I believe in gender equality and the individual ’s potential for superiority of purpose based on the merits of one’s character, morals, and general ability. I try to consider the best qualified regardless of their gender because to me, and this is my opinion, choosing a person based entirely on the immutable factors of their identity rather than their abilities is fundamentally short sighted and ignorant. When all immutable factors of identity are thrown out, we as intelligent human beings should be able to determine a person’s abilities and choose the best person for a particular job. Moreover, I think we should want to choose that way. However, we are creatures of comfort and don’t always do what is most logical because we base a lot of our decisions on feelings rather than rational thought. “Go with your gut.” Still, that’s not the same as putting forth superiority as a concept.
An example regarding doctors. Generally speaking, if I’m looking for a doctor, I will always go with the most qualified regardless of race, gender, or other inborn characteristics. I will seek out the most proven track record and make an appointment with the one least likely to let me die be they male or female. That said, after I was raped a few years ago, I chose a female doctor because the idea of a man putting his hands on me made me vomit. I would have chosen a female doctor if she were using a speculum made of play-doh or had gotten her diploma from a Cracker Jack box. It was an emotionally driven decision. It was what I needed at the time. It was a preference, but even while I was making that decision, I still believed that a male doctor could have examined me just as effectively.
Now, applying that to a presidential question. If a person who looks at Hillary Clinton, and removes all immutable factors of identity sees her as the best person for the position of president and chooses not to vote for her because she’s a woman, they are exercising preference. Even though I may look at that preference and see it as an emotional decision, an irrational decision, and a socially irresponsible decision, it’s still their preference. It’s not the choice that I might make, but I’m not making it. I would say the same thing if the person looked at Hillary Clinton, removed the factors of her birth and saw a person NOT suited for the job of president and still voted for her but it’s their decision, their preference driven by their needs, emotions, and thought processes that I am not privy to and do not understand. In my brain, that is totally different from saying “No woman is fit to lead.” which is a highly intolerant and ignorant statement especially when it is possible to declare a strong preference for male leaders without dismissing the abilities and PROVEN accomplishments of a whole gender!
Anyway, all that said, I know that preference is a hard (and silly) thing to argue. Master says that “Preference releases a person from the shackles of practical decision making.” and it’s really true, but I don’t believe that having a preference is the same as declaring categorically that one choice or the other is superior or inferior to another. I will always believe that assigning superiority or inferiority based solely on immutable factors of identity widens the divide and takes us further from becoming a tolerant society. This isn’t a game of semantics. Preference and Superiority are entirely different concepts. Saying men are superior to women is just as shortsighted as a racist argument that replaces the words “men” and “women” with various races. It’s frighteningly intolerant thinking. There’s really no sugar coating it. Stating preferences without supporting arguments of superiority is possible and while it’s not idyllic, but it keeps the door open for progress and change and that’s the choice I make. (wow, that got long…)
(as for who I’m voted for in the primary, well, it’s like this: I’m a slave and as such my vote is just a second ballot for my Master. That said, he told me to vote the same way I would have if I were free to vote my choice instead of just being a second vote for him. )